Our cloning, protein expression, and enzyme assay protocols for building and testing the PETosome, written up in enough detail for other teams to replicate our work.
Wet Lab Lead: Christian. Christian led the team's cloning, protein expression, and enzyme assay work over several weeks, and prepared the detailed protocols and results below. This is the team's primary, most heavily-invested experimental work.
The experiment section includes the detailed procedures for cloning, enzyme assay, and protein expression. The central aim of the project is to engineer a cellulosome-inspired multi-enzyme complex, termed the PETosome, which co-localizes a dockerin-fused PET hydrolase (ICCG-DoT) and a dockerin-fused MHET hydrolase (TfCa-DoG) on a trimeric cohesin scaffold protein (ScafGVT) for synergistic and sequential degradation of PET into its constituent monomers, terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG).
Following amplification of the gene of interest by PCR and insertion into the pET28a plasmid vector backbone using the NEB Quick Ligation Kit, E. coli DH5α were transformed for plasmid propagation. Colony PCR and Sanger sequencing were then used to confirm the final insert, and BL21 E. coli were transformed for protein expression. Expression products were then purified by Ni-NTA IMAC and assessed for quality by SDS-PAGE; protein identity was confirmed using Western blot. Enzyme activity assays were then used to evaluate the PET-degrading performance of the recombinant constructs both qualitatively and quantitatively.
1.1 Purpose
This protocol describes the amplification of target gene inserts — including ICCG, DockerinT, TfCa, DockerinG, TfCaWA, and ScafGVT coding sequences — using Q5® High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (NEB #M0491). Q5 was selected for all insert amplification steps due to its ultra-high fidelity (~280× higher than Taq), which minimizes sequence errors in the final constructs prior to sequencing verification.
1.2 Materials
Reagents
Equipment
1.3 Reaction Setup
Assemble all reaction components on ice. Mix each component gently before adding to the reaction tube. Add Q5 polymerase last. Collect all liquid to the bottom of the tube with a brief centrifuge spin before placing in the thermocycler.
| Component | 25 µl Reaction | 50 µl Reaction | Final Concentration |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5X Q5 Reaction Buffer | 5 µl | 10 µl | 1X |
| 10 mM dNTPs | 0.5 µl | 1 µl | 200 µM |
| 10 µM Forward Primer | 1.25 µl | 2.5 µl | 0.5 µM |
| 10 µM Reverse Primer | 1.25 µl | 2.5 µl | 0.5 µM |
| Template DNA | Variable | Variable | < 1,000 ng |
| Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase | 0.25 µl | 0.5 µl | 0.02 U/µl |
| 5X Q5 High GC Enhancer (optional) | (5 µl) | (10 µl) | (1X) |
| Nuclease-Free Water | To 25 µl | To 50 µl | — |
1.4 Thermocycling Conditions
| Step | Temperature | Time | Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Denaturation | 98°C | 30 seconds | 1 |
| Denaturation | 98°C | 5–10 seconds | 25–35 |
| Annealing | 50–72°C* | 10–30 seconds | 25–35 |
| Extension | 72°C | 20–30 sec/kb | 25–35 |
| Final Extension | 72°C | 2 minutes | 1 |
| Hold | 4–10°C | ∞ | — |
1.5 Step-by-Step Procedure
2.1 Purpose
Restriction enzyme digestion is used to generate compatible cohesive ends on both the purified PCR insert and the linearised vector backbone (pET28a(+) or pKLAC2), enabling directional ligation. For all constructs in this project, double digestion with two restriction enzymes was performed to ensure directional cloning and to prevent vector self-ligation. The specific enzyme pairs used depended on the construct (e.g., XbaI/EcoRI-HF for ICCG-DoT cloning; see the construct-specific cloning schematic in the pptx results slides for details).
2.2 Materials
Reagents
Equipment
2.3 Reaction Setup (50 µl)
Set up all reactions on ice. Restriction enzymes must always be added last.
| Component | Volume / Amount |
|---|---|
| Purified DNA | 1 µg |
| 10X NEBuffer (CutSmart or appropriate) | 5 µl (1X final) |
| Restriction Enzyme 1 | 1 µl |
| Restriction Enzyme 2 | 1 µl |
| Nuclease-free Water | To 50 µl |
2.4 Step-by-Step Procedure
3.1 Purpose
Following restriction enzyme digestion, the digested insert and linearised vector backbone are joined using the NEB Quick Ligation™ Kit (NEB #M2200). This kit enables efficient ligation of cohesive-end DNA fragments within 5 minutes at room temperature, making it suitable for high-throughput cloning workflows.
3.2 Materials
3.3 Reaction Setup (20 µl)
Set up the reaction in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube on ice. Add Quick Ligase last.
| Component | Volume | Final Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Quick Ligase Reaction Buffer (2X) | 10 µl | 1X |
| Vector DNA | X µl | 50 ng (0.020 pmol for 4 kb vector) |
| Insert DNA | X µl | 37.5 ng (0.060 pmol for 1 kb insert) |
| Quick Ligase | 1 µl | — |
| Nuclease-free Water | To 20 µl | — |
3.4 Step-by-Step Procedure
4.1 Purpose
The ligation product is introduced into chemically competent E. coli cells by heat-shock transformation. Transformed cells are plated onto selective antibiotic media and incubated overnight to allow single colony formation. For routine cloning and plasmid propagation, E. coli DH5α competent cells were used. For protein expression experiments, E. coli BL21(DE3) or BL21 Rosetta™ DE3 strains were used (see protein expression protocols).
4.2 Materials
4.3 Step-by-Step Procedure
5.1 Purpose
Colony PCR is used to rapidly screen transformed colonies for the presence of the correctly inserted gene of interest prior to miniprep and sequencing. Taq 2X Master Mix (NEB #M0270) is used for colony PCR, as the dA-overhang products generated are compatible with downstream subcloning if needed, and the cost-effectiveness of Taq is appropriate for high-throughput screening. Primer pairs flanking the insert-vector junction are used for confirmation.
5.2 Materials
5.3 Reaction Setup (25 µl per colony)
| Component | Volume | Final Concentration |
|---|---|---|
| Taq 2X Master Mix | 12.5 µl | 1X |
| 10 µM Forward Primer | 0.5 µl | 0.2 µM |
| 10 µM Reverse Primer | 0.5 µl | 0.2 µM |
| Nuclease-free Water | 11.5 µl | — |
| Colony (template) | — | Direct inoculation |
5.4 Step-by-Step Procedure
| Step | Temperature | Time | Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Denaturation (cell lysis) | 95°C | 5 minutes | 1 |
| Denaturation | 95°C | 15–30 seconds | 30 |
| Annealing | 45–68°C* | 15–60 seconds | 30 |
| Extension | 68°C | 1 min/kb | 30 |
| Final Extension | 68°C | 5 minutes | 1 |
| Hold | 4–10°C | ∞ | — |
6.1 Purpose
Plasmid DNA is isolated from overnight E. coli cultures of colony PCR-positive clones using the Geneaid High-Speed Plasmid Mini Kit. The isolated plasmid DNA is then subjected to Sanger sequencing to confirm the correct sequence of the insert and its junction with the vector.
6.2 Materials
6.3 Step-by-Step Procedure
Step 1 — Harvesting
Step 2 — Resuspension
Step 3 — Lysis
Step 4 — Neutralisation
Step 5 — DNA Binding
Step 6 — Wash (Optional W1 Wash for Sequencing)
Step 7 — DNA Elution
The table below summarises the key parameters for each protocol in the plasmid construction workflow.
| Protocol | Purpose | Key Reagent / Kit | Critical Parameter |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. PCR (Insert Amplification) | Amplify gene insert with high fidelity | Q5® Polymerase (NEB #M0491) | Extension time: 20–30 sec/kb; Tm via NEB Calculator |
| 2. Restriction Enzyme Digestion | Generate compatible cohesive ends | HF Restriction Enzymes (NEB) | Double digest; verify with NEBcloner; 1 µg DNA per reaction |
| 3. Ligation | Join insert and vector | Quick Ligation™ Kit (NEB #M2200) | 5 min at 25°C; 1:3 vector:insert molar ratio |
| 4. Transformation | Introduce construct into E. coli | Competent E. coli (DH5α) | 30 sec heat shock at 42°C; 60 min recovery at 37°C |
| 5. Colony PCR | Screen colonies for correct insert | Taq 2X Master Mix (NEB #M0270) | 5 min initial denaturation at 95°C; check band at expected bp |
| 6. Miniprep & Sequencing | Purify plasmid; confirm sequence | Geneaid High-Speed Plasmid Mini Kit | A260/A280 = 1.7–1.9; submit for Sanger sequencing |
7.1 Purpose
This protocol describes IPTG-inducible expression of 8×His-tagged recombinant proteins from pET28a(+)-based constructs in E. coli. Expression conditions (strain, temperature, IPTG concentration, induction time, and growth medium) were optimised individually for each construct to maximise soluble protein yield. The specific conditions used for each construct are summarised in Section 7.4.
7.2 Materials
Reagents
Equipment
7.3 General Step-by-Step Procedure
NOTE: Collect a 1 mL pre-induction sample (aliquot) and 1 mL post-induction samples at each time point into individual 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes. Centrifuge at 13,000 × g for 10 minutes, aspirate supernatant, and store pellets at −70°C for SDS-PAGE analysis of expression levels over time.
7.4 Construct-Specific Expression Conditions
| Construct | Expression Strain | Growth Medium | Induction Temp. | IPTG Conc. | Induction Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICCG-DoT (PETase; 39.9 kDa) | E. coli BL21 Rosetta™ DE3 | Terrific Broth (TB) | 37°C | 0.5 mM (at OD600 0.6–0.8) | 24 hr |
| TfCa-DoG (MHETase; 64.79 kDa) | E. coli BL21 DE3 | LB + 2 mM CaCl2 | 18°C | 5 mM (at OD600 0.6–0.8) | 15 hr |
| ScafGVT (Scaffold; 58.96 kDa) | E. coli BL21 DE3 | LB broth | 16°C | 0.2 mM (at OD600 0.6–0.8) | 19 hr |
NOTE: The use of E. coli BL21 Rosetta™ DE3 for ICCG-DoT expression provides extra tRNAs for rare codons present in the ICCG sequence derived from Leaf-Branch Compost Cutinase (LCCICCG).
NOTE: The low induction temperature for TfCa-DoG (18°C) and ScafGVT (16°C) promotes slower protein synthesis, reducing the risk of inclusion body formation and improving soluble protein yield.
NOTE: Supplementation of 2 mM CaCl2 in the TfCa-DoG expression medium supports correct folding of the TfCa (TfCut2) domain, which has a calcium-binding site required for thermostability.
8.1 Purpose
Following harvest, bacterial cell pellets are lysed to release soluble recombinant protein for downstream affinity purification. Lysis is achieved by resuspension in a detergent-containing lysis buffer followed by probe sonication. Sonication mechanically disrupts cell membranes and reduces lysate viscosity by shearing chromosomal DNA.
8.2 Materials
Lysis Buffer Composition (per 10 mL)
Prepare fresh on the day of use. Add lysozyme and PMSF immediately before use. Add DNase only after sonication.
| Component | Final Concentration / Amount | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Tris-HCl pH 8.0 | 50 mM (0.060 g per 10 mL) | Adjust pH to 8.0 |
| Glycerol | 10% (v/v) | Stabilises protein; prevents aggregation |
| Triton X-100 | 0.1% (v/v) | Non-ionic detergent; aids membrane disruption |
| Lysozyme | 0.001 g per 10 mL (~0.1 mg/mL) | Add fresh; assists cell wall digestion |
| PMSF | 1 mM | Serine protease inhibitor; add fresh from 100 mM stock in ethanol |
| MgCl2 | 2 mM (0.002 g per 10 mL) | Cofactor for DNase activity |
| DNase I | ~2% of final volume | Add AFTER sonication to digest released chromosomal DNA |
CAUTION: Do not add EDTA to this lysis buffer. EDTA chelates Ni2+ ions and will interfere with downstream His-tag affinity purification.
CAUTION: PMSF is toxic and unstable in aqueous solution. Prepare a 100 mM stock in absolute ethanol and add to the lysis buffer immediately before use.
8.3 Sonication Instrument Settings
The following settings apply to a standard probe sonicator (e.g., Branson or equivalent) for a sample volume of 0.5–1 mL resuspended in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube.
| Parameter | Setting |
|---|---|
| Timer per pulse | 30 seconds |
| Pulse cycle ON | 5 seconds |
| Pulse cycle OFF | 5 seconds |
| Amplitude | 37% (do not exceed 40%) |
| Number of pulses | 3 × 30 seconds (9 pulses total per sample) |
| Interval between samples | 20 seconds (probe rested in ice) |
8.4 Step-by-Step Procedure
Preparation
Sonication
NOTE: If the sample becomes warm during sonication, extend the rest period between pulses. Protein integrity is compromised if the sample temperature rises above ~10°C.
NOTE: For sample volumes larger than 10 mL, replace the sonicator probe with a larger-volume tip suitable for the increased volume. Using a small tip on a large volume reduces sonication efficiency and may damage the probe.
Post-Sonication Clarification
9.1 Purpose
Recombinant 8×His-tagged proteins are purified from clarified cell lysates by immobilised metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using PureCube 100 INDIGO Ni-Agarose resin (Cube Biotech, Cat. No. 75103/75105). The polyhistidine tag binds selectively to Ni2+ ions chelated on the resin. Non-specifically bound contaminants are removed by stepwise imidazole washes, and the target protein is eluted at high imidazole concentration. Imidazole wash concentrations were optimised empirically for each construct based on preliminary purification tests (see demo data).
9.2 Materials
9.3 Resin Properties (PureCube 100 INDIGO Ni-Agarose)
| Property | Specification |
|---|---|
| Bead size | 100 µm (particle diameter 50–150 µm) |
| Binding capacity | Up to 100 mg protein/mL resin (tested with 6×His-eGFP) |
| Metal ion capacity | > 75 µeqv Ni2+/mL resin |
| Chelator stability | Stable in up to 20 mM DTT and 20 mM EDTA |
| Suspension form | 50% (v/v) suspension; 2 mL suspension = 1 mL bed volume |
| Storage | 4°C in neutral buffer with 20% ethanol (long-term) |
| pH compatibility | pH 4–13 |
9.4 Construct-Specific Imidazole Wash Conditions
The imidazole concentration gradient used for washing was optimised to balance removal of non-specifically bound host proteins while retaining the target His-tagged protein on the resin. The following conditions were used:
| Construct | Equilibration | Wash 1 | Wash 2 | Elution 1 | Elution 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICCG-DoT (39.9 kDa) | 10 mM | 50 mM | 90 mM | 250 mM | 250 mM |
| TfCa-DoG (64.79 kDa) | 10 mM | 50 mM | 70–90 mM | 250 mM | 300–500 mM |
| ScafGVT (58.96 kDa) | 10 mM | 50 mM | 90 mM | 250 mM | 250 mM |
NOTE: All buffers were prepared in 1× PBS pH 7.4 with the indicated imidazole concentration. A more stringent wash (higher imidazole in equilibration buffer, e.g., 40 mM) can be used to reduce background, as demonstrated in preliminary purification trials. However, the 10 mM equilibration / 250 mM elution scheme was adopted as the standard condition for these constructs.
9.5 Step-by-Step Procedure
Column Preparation
Sample Loading
Washing
Elution
Dialysis and Concentration
9.6 Protein Quantification — Pierce BCA Assay
Protein concentration of purified fractions is determined using the Pierce® BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific), based on the colorimetric reduction of Cu2+ to Cu+ by protein in alkaline conditions, forming a purple chelate complex detectable at 562 nm.
10.1 Purpose
SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) is used to assess the molecular weight, purity, and relative abundance of proteins across all purification fractions. Coomassie Blue R-250 staining provides total protein visualisation. For each construct, 10% polyacrylamide separating gels were used, providing optimal resolution in the 18–75 kDa range — appropriate for ICCG-DoT (39.9 kDa), TfCa-DoG (64.79 kDa), and ScafGVT (58.96 kDa).
10.2 Gel Preparation
Separating Gel (10 mL, 10% acrylamide — for 0.75–1 mm spacer plates, two gels)
| Component | 8% | 10% | 12% | 15% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4X Lower Gel Buffer (mL) | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| ddH2O (mL) | 5.4 | 4.9 | 4.4 | 3.65 |
| 40% 29:1 Acrylamide/Bis (mL) | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.75 |
| 10% Ammonium Persulfate (mL) | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| TEMED (mL) | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Optimal resolution range | 30–120 kDa | 18–75 kDa | 15–60 kDa | 15–45 kDa |
Stacking Gel (5 mL, 4%)
| Component | Volume |
|---|---|
| 4X Upper Gel Buffer | 1.25 mL |
| ddH2O | 3.3 mL |
| 40% 29:1 Acrylamide/Bis | 0.4 mL |
| 10% Ammonium Persulfate | 0.1 mL |
| TEMED | 0.008 mL |
Buffer Recipes
10.3 Sample Preparation
10.4 Electrophoresis
10.5 Coomassie Blue Staining
Staining Solution (1 L): Coomassie Blue R-250 (1 g) + Methanol (450 mL) + ddH2O (450 mL) + Glacial Acetic Acid (100 mL)
Destaining Solution (1 L): Methanol (500 mL) + Acetic Acid (100 mL) + ddH2O (400 mL)
11.1 Purpose
Immunoblotting confirms the identity of the expressed recombinant His-tagged protein by detection with an anti-His-tag antibody. Following SDS-PAGE, proteins are transferred to a PVDF membrane and probed sequentially with primary (anti-His) and secondary (HRP-conjugated) antibodies. Signal is visualised by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL).
11.2 Antibodies Used
| Antibody | Host | Specificity | Dilution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary: Rabbit anti-His Tag Ab (LTK BioLaboratories) | Rabbit | 8×His tag | 1:1000 | LTK BioLaboratories |
| Secondary: Goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP | Goat | Rabbit IgG | 1:1000 | Standard commercial supplier |
NOTE: Antibody information used in this project: 1° Ab — Rabbit anti-His Ab (LTK BioLaboratories), 1:1000 dilution in TTBS. 2° Ab — Goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP, 1:1000 dilution in TTBS.
11.3 Buffer Recipes
11.4 Step-by-Step Procedure
Protein Transfer to PVDF Membrane
Blocking
Primary Antibody Incubation
Secondary Antibody Incubation
ECL Detection and Imaging
NOTE: The expected molecular weights for anti-His signal are: ICCG-DoT — 39.9 kDa; TfCa-DoG — 64.79 kDa; ScafGVT — 58.96 kDa.
| Protocol | Purpose | Key Reagent / Method | Critical Parameter |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7. Protein Expression | Express His-tagged protein in E. coli | IPTG induction; strain-specific conditions | Temperature, IPTG conc., induction time (see Section 7.4) |
| 8. Cell Lysis / Sonication | Release soluble protein from cells | Lysis buffer + probe sonication | 3 × 30 s pulses; amplitude 37%; keep sample on ice |
| 9. Ni-NTA IMAC Purification | Isolate His-tagged protein from lysate | PureCube 100 INDIGO Ni-Agarose (Cube Biotech) | Stepwise imidazole wash; construct-specific concentrations (Section 9.4) |
| 10. SDS-PAGE | Assess protein size and purity | 10% Coomassie-stained PAGE gel | 35–45 µl per well; 100 V for ~2 hr in separating gel |
| 11. Western Blot | Confirm His-tag identity of target protein | Anti-His primary Ab (1:1000) + HRP secondary Ab | Overnight 4°C incubation with primary Ab; ECL detection |
12.1 Purpose
The PET agar plate clearing assay provides a rapid, qualitative assessment of PET-degrading activity directly from bacterial cell fractions (pellet lysate, culture supernatant, and dialysed concentrated protein). PET dissolved in DMSO is incorporated into agar, forming a turbid plate. Enzymatic degradation of PET produces a visible clearing halo around the well, indicating hydrolytic activity. This assay was used to confirm that ICCG-DoT retains PETase activity after expression and purification, and to compare activity across different protein fractions.
12.2 Materials
Reagents
Equipment
12.3 Preparation of PET-DMSO Agar Plates
NOTE: Plates can be prepared in advance and stored at 4°C for up to one week. Pre-warm plates to 37°C for 30 minutes before use.
12.4 Assay Procedure
NOTE: In this project, ICCG-DoT activity was screened at 100 µl per well. Visible clearing halos were observed for the Dialysed Concentrate fraction, confirming PETase activity of the purified protein. No clearing was observed for the Empty Vector Control, as expected.
NOTE: The absence of clearing in the Pellet Lysate and Culture Supernatant fractions is consistent with the periplasmic/intracellular expression of ICCG-DoT directed by the pelB signal peptide, which targets secretion to the periplasm rather than the culture medium.
13.1 Purpose
High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to quantitatively identify and measure the concentrations of PET hydrolysis products — specifically bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET), mono(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (MHET), and terephthalic acid (TPA) — released from amorphous PET (APET) film by ICCG-DoT. HPLC provides chromatographic separation of these structurally related products, allowing simultaneous identification by retention time and quantification by peak area integration.
13.2 Reaction Setup for APET Film Degradation
The following conditions were used for the APET film degradation reaction prior to HPLC analysis:
| Parameter | Condition |
|---|---|
| Enzyme | ICCG-DoT (dialysed concentrate) |
| Enzyme concentration | 100 mU · mL−1 |
| Substrate | APET (amorphous PET) film |
| Reaction volume | 5 mL in reaction buffer |
| Reaction buffer | 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 |
| Temperature | 37°C |
| Agitation | 230 rpm (orbital shaker) |
| Reaction duration | 96 hours |
| Sample dilution for HPLC | 2.5× dilution of reaction supernatant |
13.3 Sample Preparation for HPLC
13.4 HPLC Instrument Parameters
| Parameter | Setting / Condition |
|---|---|
| Column type | Reversed-phase C18 column (e.g., 250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm particle size) |
| Mobile phase A | 0.1% (v/v) phosphoric acid in HPLC-grade water |
| Mobile phase B | Acetonitrile (HPLC grade) |
| Gradient programme | 0–5 min: 5% B; 5–20 min: 5→50% B; 20–25 min: 50% B; 25–26 min: 50→5% B; 26–30 min: 5% B (re-equilibration) |
| Flow rate | 1.0 mL/min |
| Column temperature | 25–30°C |
| Detection wavelength | UV at 240 nm (for simultaneous detection of BHET, MHET, and TPA) |
| Injection volume | 10–20 µl |
| Run time | 30 minutes per sample |
NOTE: Expected retention times under these conditions: TPA elutes at approximately 11.2 minutes; MHET at approximately 12.0 minutes; BHET at approximately 12.4 minutes. Verify with authentic standards prior to sample analysis.
NOTE: MHET was the predominant product detected after 96 hours of ICCG-DoT activity on APET film (67% of total peak area), with TPA accounting for 32% and BHET for 1%, indicating that ICCG-DoT efficiently cleaves PET chains to release MHET as the primary intermediate product.
13.5 Data Analysis
14.1 Purpose
This protocol describes the quantitative enzyme activity assay used to measure and compare the specific activity (µM product released per µg enzyme per hour) of the recombinant constructs individually and in combination. Bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET) was used as a soluble, defined substrate that closely mimics the PET polymer chain structure, enabling precise kinetic measurements. This assay was used to: (i) compare ICCG-DoT vs. ICCG (without dockerin) activity toward BHET, MHET, and TPA over time; (ii) test the effect of ScafGVT scaffold on ICCG-DoT activity; and (iii) assess synergistic activity of ICCG-DoT plus TfCa-DoG in combined reactions.
14.2 Materials
Reagents
14.3 Standard Reaction Conditions
| Parameter | Condition |
|---|---|
| Total reaction volume | 5 mL in reaction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) |
| BHET substrate concentration | 98 µM |
| Enzyme concentration | 100 mU · mL−1 for each enzyme |
| ScafGVT scaffold (where applicable) | 1 µg · mL−1 |
| Reaction temperature | 37°C (for ICCG-DoT/TfCa-DoG combination assay); 50°C (for ICCG-DoT scaffold synergy assay) |
| pH | 7.5 |
| Agitation | 230 rpm (orbital shaker) |
| Sampling time points | 0, 1, 2, 3, 14, 19, 24 hr (combined assay); 24, 48, 72, 96 hr (scaffold synergy assay) |
14.4 Experimental Groups
Four experimental groups were included in each run to allow direct comparison:
| Group | Components | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| ICCG-DoT alone (ICCG-T) | ICCG-DoT (100 mU · mL−1) | Baseline PETase activity with dockerin fusion |
| TfCa-DoG alone (TfCa-G) | TfCa-DoG (100 mU · mL−1) | Baseline MHETase activity alone |
| ICCG-DoT + TfCa-DoG (1:1) | ICCG-DoT (100 mU · mL−1) + TfCa-DoG (100 mU · mL−1) | Combined PETase + MHETase activity; synergy test |
| ICCG (no dockerin) + TfCa-DoG (ICCGT+TfCaG) | ICCG (100 mU · mL−1) + TfCa-DoG (100 mU · mL−1) | Positive control: unfused enzyme combination |
| ICCG-DoT + ScafGVT | ICCG-DoT (100 mU · mL−1) + ScafGVT (1 µg · mL−1) | Test effect of scaffold assembly on PETase activity |
| ICCG-DoT alone (no scaffold control) | ICCG-DoT (100 mU · mL−1) | Negative control for scaffold synergy test |
14.5 Step-by-Step Procedure
Reaction Setup
Incubation and Sampling
HPLC Analysis of Reaction Aliquots
14.6 Calculation of Specific Activity
Specific activity is calculated as the amount of product released (in µM) per unit mass of enzyme (in µg) per unit time (per hour):
Specific Activity (µM · µg−1) = [Product] (µM) ÷ Enzyme amount (µg) ÷ Time (hr)
where [Product] is the measured concentration of BHET consumed or MHET/TPA produced in µM; enzyme amount is derived from the total enzyme mass added to the reaction (concentration in µg/mL × volume in mL); and time is the incubation duration in hours at each sampling point.
For the combined ICCG-DoT + TfCa-DoG assay, the mole fraction (χ) of each substrate/product is reported as a dimensionless ratio relative to the initial substrate concentration, as follows:
χ (BHET) = [BHET]t ÷ [BHET]0 χ (MHET) = [MHET]t ÷ [BHET]0 χ (TPA) = [TPA]t ÷ [BHET]0
15.1 Purpose
This assay tests whether the trimeric cohesin scaffold protein (ScafGVT) has any positive or negative effect on the PET-degrading activity of dockerin-fused ICCG-DoT, when the two proteins are combined to allow cohesin-dockerin assembly in solution prior to adding the APET film substrate. The assay monitors the kinetics of BHET, MHET, and TPA production over 96 hours at 50°C.
15.2 Reaction Conditions
| Parameter | Condition |
|---|---|
| Enzyme | ICCG-DoT (dockerin-fused PETase) |
| Scaffold | ScafGVT (trimeric cohesin scaffold; Coh-G, Coh-V, Coh-T) |
| Enzyme concentration | 100 mU · mL−1 (ICCG-DoT) |
| Scaffold concentration | 1 µg · mL−1 (ScafGVT) |
| Substrate | APET film (amorphous PET) |
| Reaction buffer | 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mL total volume |
| Temperature | 50°C |
| Agitation | 230 rpm |
| Time points | 24, 48, 72, 96 hours |
| Control | ICCG-DoT alone (no ScafGVT) at equivalent concentration |
15.3 Pre-Assembly of ScafGVT and ICCG-DoT
The table below summarises all four activity assays performed in this project, their purpose, key conditions, and the constructs evaluated.
| Protocol | Assay Type | Substrate | Key Conditions | Constructs Evaluated | Primary Output |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12. PET Agar Plate | Qualitative screening | DMSO-dissolved PET agar | 37°C; 48–96 hr; 100 µl/well | ICCG-DoT fractions vs. empty vector control | Clearing halo (yes/no); halo diameter |
| 13. HPLC Product ID | Product identification & quantification | APET film | 37°C; 230 rpm; 96 hr; 100 mU/mL ICCG-DoT; 2.5× dilution | ICCG-DoT | BHET/MHET/TPA % composition and concentration (µM) |
| 14. BHET Kinetic Assay | Quantitative specific activity | BHET (98 µM) | 37°C (combined) or 50°C (scaffold); pH 7.5; 230 rpm; 100 mU/mL | ICCG-DoT, TfCa-DoG, ICCG-DoT+TfCa-DoG, ICCG+TfCa-DoG | Specific activity (µM · µg−1) vs. time; χ BHET/MHET/TPA |
| 15. Scaffold Synergy Assay | Scaffold effect on PETase | APET film | 50°C; pH 7.5; 230 rpm; 100 mU/mL ICCG-DoT; 1 µg/mL ScafGVT | ICCG-DoT ± ScafGVT | Specific activity (µM · µg−1) vs. time (24–96 hr) |
Result (SDS-PAGE): the Coomassie-stained gel shows total protein across sequential Ni-NTA IMAC purification fractions. A prominent band at approximately 39.9 kDa is visible in the 250mM imidazole elution fractions and the dialysed concentrate, consistent with ICCG-DoT's predicted molecular weight.
Result (Western Blot): anti-His antibody detection confirmed the identity of the ~39.9 kDa band observed in the SDS-PAGE as the His-tagged ICCG-DoT protein.
Result (Plate Assay): the plate assay confirmed that purified ICCG-DoT displayed PET-degrading activity, shown by a clearing halo in the dialysed-concentrate quadrant. The absence of a halo in the empty-vector control rules out non-specific background activity.
Result (HPLC): HPLC demonstrated that ICCG-DoT effectively depolymerises APET film after 96 hours, generating predominantly MHET (67%) with TPA (32%) and trace amounts of BHET (1%). The predominance of MHET over TPA indicates that ICCG-DoT is active primarily as a PETase, with comparatively little activity as an MHETase — the same bottleneck motivating the project's two-enzyme PETosome design.
Note: a standard curve for TPA quantification was still outstanding as of this write-up and is not yet included here.
This section reflects work performed by Qi Jia, an external advisor to the team, and is presented here as supplementary/comparative material rather than the team's own primary experimental work.
Four recombinant constructs (ICCG-DoT, TfCa-DoG, ScafGVT, TfCaWA-DoG) were built in a pET28a(+) backbone under T7-promoter control, each carrying a C-terminal TEV-cleavage site and 8×His tag.
Cloning: Q5® High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (NEB #M0491) for all insert amplification (25µl/50µl reaction scales, 0.5µM primers, 200µM dNTPs); NEB high-fidelity restriction enzymes for directional cloning; NEB Quick Ligation Kit (1:3 vector:insert, 5 min, 25°C); chemically competent E. coli DH5α for propagation (heat shock 42°C, 30s; 60 min recovery); Taq 2× Master Mix for colony PCR screening; Sanger sequencing for final verification.
Expression: conditions optimised per construct — ICCG-DoT in BL21 Rosetta(DE3), Terrific Broth, 0.5mM IPTG at OD₆₀₀ 0.6–0.8, 37°C, 24h; TfCa-DoG in BL21(DE3), LB + 2mM CaCl₂, 5mM IPTG, 18°C, 15h; ScafGVT in BL21(DE3), LB, 0.2mM IPTG, 16°C, 19h.
Purification: PureCube 100 INDIGO Ni-Agarose IMAC (10mM imidazole equilibration, 50/90mM washes, 250mM elution; TfCa-DoG received an additional 300–500mM elution step); dialysis into 50mM Tris pH 7.5, 150mM NaCl, 10% glycerol; Pierce BCA assay for quantification.
Activity assays: para-nitrophenyl butyrate (PNPB) esterase assay (250µM PNPB, 1× TBS + 10mM CaCl₂ + 10% DMSO, pH 7.5, 405nm); DMSO-dissolved APET agar plates (1–2% w/v PET); reversed-phase C18 HPLC (0.1% phosphoric acid/acetonitrile gradient, 1 mL/min, UV 240nm) for product quantification against TPA/MHET/BHET standards.
Each construct followed the same general cloning pipeline: PCR amplification → restriction digestion of insert and vector → ligation → transformation → colony PCR screening → miniprep and sequencing. From there, three complementary activity-assay protocols were used: (1) a qualitative PET-agar plate-clearing assay for rapid screening of degrading activity directly from cell fractions; (2) HPLC-based quantification of hydrolytic products released from amorphous PET (APET) film; and (3) quantitative kinetic assays against defined substrates (BHET, MHET) to measure individual-enzyme performance and synergistic effects of the assembled PETosome. Full numbered, step-by-step versions of every protocol — including reagent lists, reaction tables, and troubleshooting notes — are maintained in the team's internal protocol documents.
Each experiment maps onto a specific question in the PETosome design. The plate-clearing assay and HPLC product profiling confirm that the purified PETase (ICCG-DoT) is correctly folded and active against real PET, and reveal where the reaction stalls (MHET accumulates, marking MHET→TPA as the rate-limiting step — the exact bottleneck the project's MHETase is designed to relieve). The BHET kinetic assay tests two design-critical questions directly: does dockerin fusion cost the PETase activity, and does docking onto the scaffold cost anything further? The five-group APET-film assay then places those same comparisons in the context of the real polymer substrate rather than an isolated defined substrate, and adds a scaffold-dose condition and a no-enzyme control to rule out non-enzymatic degradation. Together, these experiments build the case for the PETosome incrementally: enzyme works → bottleneck identified → fusion cost measured → scaffold shown compatible → two-enzyme synergy demonstrated on both a defined substrate and real PET film.
The five-group APET-film assay illustrates the design pattern used throughout: Group 1 (ICCG-DoT alone, 100 mU) as the baseline; Group 2 (ICCG-DoT + TfCa-DoG, 100/100 mU) as the core synergy test; Group 3 (100/300 mU) to test whether raising the MHETase dose helps or hurts; Group 4 (Group 2 + 1µg/mL ScafGVT) to test scaffold compatibility; and Group 5 (PET substrate, no enzyme) as the negative control ruling out non-enzymatic hydrolysis. Reaction composition was specified down to the microlitre (e.g. Group 2: 6.24µl ICCG-DoT + 2.05µl TfCa-DoG topped to 5 mL with 2nd-generation reaction buffer), with all five groups run in parallel at matched temperature (50°C) and agitation (230 rpm).
Each group was run with 3 repeats, sampled daily (5 groups × 3 repeats = 15 samples per timepoint). The replicate count was a deliberate resource trade-off rather than a statistically-derived target: every additional repeat consumes lab time and reagents (purified enzyme stock, HPLC run time, consumables), and with a fixed two-week experimental window and limited reagent supply, 3 repeats per condition was judged the largest number the team could sustain across all conditions and timepoints without compromising the breadth of the DBTL cycle (multiple constructs, multiple assay types, two full time-course experiments). This is a real constraint of a first-cycle, resource-limited student project, and is treated as such rather than presented as a statistically optimised sample size.
This section analyses the depolymerisation activity data from the PETosome constructs (ICCG-DoT, TfCa-DoG, ScafGVT), comparing dockerin-fused and scaffold-docked enzyme conditions against free-enzyme controls, and testing the project's core two-enzyme synergy claim.
Mean ± SD (n=2 or 3 replicates) product concentration for each PETosome condition and timepoint, TPA/MHET/BHET in µM:
| Condition | Time (h) | TPA (µM) | MHET (µM) | BHET (µM) | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Va — ICCGt + GVT scaffold | 24 | 1.37 ± 0.26 | 5.19 ± 0.89 | 0.28 ± 0.05 | 2 |
| 48 | 70.01 ± 1.48 | 233.51 ± 4.48 | 12.72 ± 1.57 | 2 | |
| 72 | 401.57 ± 87.27 | 1093.69 ± 270.03 | 62.67 ± 21.60 | 2 | |
| 96 | 1052.61 ± 63.39 | 2609.80 ± 150.71 | 117.19 ± 12.28 | 2 | |
| Vac — ICCG only (free enzyme) | 24 | 19.89 ± 9.95 | 79.38 ± 34.45 | 5.69 ± 1.83 | 3 |
| 48 | 174.92 ± 35.77 | 479.11 ± 92.08 | 18.18 ± 3.30 | 3 | |
| 72 | 574.71 ± 110.43 | 1450.64 ± 311.37 | 57.51 ± 15.93 | 3 | |
| 96 | 1195.90 ± 88.51 | 2710.69 ± 166.97 | 115.24 ± 12.28 | 3 | |
| Vb — ICCG(noT) + GVT scaffold | 24 | 89.03 ± 14.33 | 301.15 ± 44.01 | 15.69 ± 4.60 | 3 |
| 48 | 402.69 ± 73.56 | 1289.08 ± 297.21 | 42.14 ± 11.72 | 3 | |
| 72 | 878.57 ± 84.83 | 2725.47 ± 315.53 | 83.46 ± 13.93 | 3 | |
| 96 | 1322.48 ± 81.32 | 2596.61 ± 64.00 | 63.54 ± 5.61 | 3 | |
| Vbc — ICCG(noT) only (free enzyme, no dockerin) | 24 | 93.30 ± 19.45 | 315.04 ± 44.88 | 17.03 ± 3.85 | 3 |
| 48 | 452.75 ± 26.75 | 1481.48 ± 261.33 | 52.23 ± 13.97 | 3 | |
| 72 | 973.19 ± 78.78 | 2267.99 ± 287.44 | 70.94 ± 12.31 | 3 | |
| 96 | 1362.90 ± 68.04 | 2675.22 ± 121.83 | 80.96 ± 9.77 | 3 |
Full individual-replicate data for the two-enzyme synergy assay (BHET substrate, product distribution in %), recovered from the original lab data rather than reported summary statistics:
| Condition | Time (h) | Replicate | TPA (%) | MHET (%) | BHET (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICCG-T alone | 1 | Repeat 1 | 0.000 | 21.274 | 78.726 |
| Repeat 2 | 0.000 | 20.152 | 79.848 | ||
| Repeat 3 | 0.000 | 20.629 | 79.371 | ||
| 2 | Repeat 1 | 0.000 | 33.701 | 66.299 | |
| Repeat 2 | — | — | — | ||
| Repeat 3 | 0.000 | 34.355 | 65.645 | ||
| 3 | Repeat 1 | 0.000 | 45.469 | 54.531 | |
| Repeat 2 | 0.000 | 44.298 | 55.702 | ||
| Repeat 3 | 0.401 | 44.921 | 54.678 | ||
| 14 | Repeat 1 | 3.675 | 88.010 | 8.315 | |
| Repeat 2 | 3.445 | 88.980 | 7.575 | ||
| Repeat 3 | 3.681 | 89.401 | 6.919 | ||
| 19 | Repeat 1 | 5.306 | 90.101 | 4.593 | |
| Repeat 2 | 5.066 | 91.470 | 3.464 | ||
| Repeat 3 | 5.226 | 91.436 | 3.338 | ||
| 24 | Repeat 1 | 6.988 | 88.368 | 4.643 | |
| Repeat 2 | 6.751 | 90.130 | 3.119 | ||
| Repeat 3 | 6.913 | 90.328 | 2.759 | ||
| ICCG-T + TfCa-G | 1 | Repeat 1 | 0.000 | 70.715 | 29.285 |
| Repeat 2 | 0.308 | 74.833 | 24.859 | ||
| Repeat 3 | 0.309 | 73.323 | 26.368 | ||
| 2 | Repeat 1 | 0.673 | 84.817 | 14.511 | |
| Repeat 2 | 0.752 | 89.872 | 9.376 | ||
| Repeat 3 | 0.800 | 89.250 | 9.950 | ||
| 3 | Repeat 1 | 1.029 | 92.441 | 6.530 | |
| Repeat 2 | 1.050 | 94.791 | 4.159 | ||
| Repeat 3 | 1.079 | 94.880 | 4.042 | ||
| 14 | Repeat 1 | 5.425 | 93.676 | 0.899 | |
| Repeat 2 | 5.693 | 93.653 | 0.654 | ||
| Repeat 3 | 5.794 | 93.575 | 0.631 | ||
| 19 | Repeat 1 | 7.242 | 92.008 | 0.750 | |
| Repeat 2 | 7.575 | 91.759 | 0.666 | ||
| Repeat 3 | 7.706 | 91.505 | 0.789 | ||
| 24 | Repeat 1 | 9.078 | 89.057 | 1.215 | |
| Repeat 2 | 9.498 | 88.854 | 1.052 | ||
| Repeat 3 | 9.564 | 88.740 | 1.084 |
Note: ICCG-T alone, 2h, Repeat 2 was missing from the original lab data (recorded as blank) and is shown as —; it was excluded from the statistical tests below.
Two methods were used, chosen for the shape of each dataset rather than a default choice. Nonlinear regression + extra sum-of-squares F-test (fit a model curve to each condition, then test whether allowing two separate curves fits significantly better than forcing both conditions onto one shared curve) was used throughout, since product accumulation is a continuous kinetic process, not an arbitrary categorical grouping. The specific model differs by dataset: a power-law growth curve (y = a·tb) for concentrations still rising with no clear plateau (the PETosome µM data, and TPA% in the synergy assay), and a saturating exponential curve (y = A·(1−e−kt)) for MHET%, which visibly approaches a plateau within the observed time course.
BHET% was not separately tested: it is the compositional complement of TPA%+MHET% (BHET% ≈ 100 − TPA% − MHET%), so it carries no independent information, and its declining shape doesn't match either growth model used elsewhere — fitting a growth-shaped curve to a declining series would have been a modelling error, not a real result.
| Comparison | Product | Model | Statistic | p-value | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Va vs Vac (dockerin-fused PETase + scaffold vs. free untagged enzyme) | TPA | Power-law | F(2,16) = 10.13 | 0.0014 | Curves differ significantly |
| MHET | Power-law | F(2,16) = 4.73 | 0.024 | Curves differ significantly | |
| BHET | Power-law | F(2,16) = 0.08 | 0.93 | No significant difference | |
| Vb vs Vbc (scaffold present vs. absent, on an enzyme lacking the dockerin tag — a specificity control) | TPA | Power-law | F(2,20) = 1.44 | 0.26 | No significant difference |
| MHET | Power-law | F(2,20) = 0.07 | 0.93 | No significant difference | |
| BHET | Power-law | F(2,20) = 0.35 | 0.71 | No significant difference | |
| ICCG-T alone vs combined pair (the project's core two-enzyme synergy claim; full raw-replicate time course, 1–24h) | TPA% | Power-law | F(2,31) = 275.7 | <0.000001 | Significantly higher with both enzymes |
| MHET% | Saturating exponential | F(2,31) = 1537.8 | <0.000001 | Significantly higher with both enzymes |
Three findings hold up under direct statistical testing, not just visual comparison of the numbers.
The two-enzyme synergy claim is now the strongest result in the entire dataset. Earlier testing of this claim relied on reported summary statistics (mean ± SD) at a single 24h endpoint. Recovering the original individual-replicate data across the full 1–24h time course allowed a proper curve-based test instead, and the result is decisive: both TPA yield (F(2,31) = 275.7) and MHET accumulation (F(2,31) = 1537.8) differ overwhelmingly between the PETase-alone and combined-pair conditions (p < 0.000001 for both). This is a substantially stronger evidentiary basis than the original endpoint-only comparison, not merely a re-confirmation of it.
The scaffold shows no detectable nonspecific effect on an enzyme that cannot dock onto it (Vb vs Vbc, p > 0.25 throughout) — a useful specificity control, since it means any effect attributed to the scaffold requires actual cohesin–dockerin binding, not just its presence in solution.
The Va vs Vac comparison shows real kinetic differences in TPA and MHET (but not BHET), consistent with the combined dockerin-fusion-plus-scaffold condition following a different, initially slower but ultimately convergent, accumulation curve relative to the free untagged enzyme — matching the qualitative "converges by 96h" description in the underlying report.
Caveat: the PETosome (Va/Vac/Vb/Vbc) comparisons still rely on small sample sizes (n=2–3 per condition) and summary-level data, so those three results should be read as supporting evidence rather than definitive proof. The synergy claim is on firmer ground, since it now rests on complete individual-replicate data across six timepoints rather than a single reported endpoint.
This section reflects work performed by Maroof, an external advisor to the team, and is presented here as supplementary/comparative material rather than the team's own primary experimental work.
The goal of this component was to re-esterify recovered TPA and EG monomers into PET oligomers under mild conditions, rather than the 250–290°C, antimony-catalysed polycondensation used industrially. Two strategies were explored across two DBTL rounds.
Enzymatic route (deep eutectic solvent, DES): a choline-chloride/ethylene-glycol DES (7.0g ChCl + 5.6mL EG, 1:2 mol) formed at 80°C, with TPA (8.3g) and lipase catalyst added. Round 1 used Candida rugosa (CRB) lipase (10 wt% TPA, 24h). Round 2a switched to Novozyme 435 (immobilised Candida antarctica lipase B, 1.45g, 10wt%) plus 4Å molecular sieves (2.5g) to absorb the water of esterification, extended to 48h. Products were isolated by vacuum filtration, warm-water washing (3×), DCM extraction, and rotary evaporation; BHET was recovered separately from the DES filtrate by cold-water precipitation.
Chemical route (CDI activation): TPA was activated with carbonyldiimidazole (CDI) to a reactive terephthaloyl bis(imidazolide) intermediate, which EG then attacks to form the ester — without a metal catalyst or high temperature. Two solvents were compared: anhydrous DMAc (24h and 48h) and anhydrous THF (12h and 30h). Products were characterised by FTIR (ATR mode, 4000–500cm⁻¹), with ester formation diagnosed by the carbonyl C=O stretch shifting from 1673cm⁻¹ (carboxylic acid) to ~1720cm⁻¹ (ester).
Depolymerisation recovers TPA and EG monomers, but a genuinely closed material loop requires demonstrating that those monomers can be rebuilt into PET-like material. This component tests that second half directly, comparing a green enzymatic route against a chemical benchmark, so the team can report not just "PET broken down" but "PET broken down and rebuilt."
DES + CRB lipase (Round 1, 24h): FTIR retained the strong TPA carboxylic-acid C=O stretch at 1673cm⁻¹ with no clear ester C=O band near 1720cm⁻¹ — esterification was incomplete. Likely causes: lower CRB activity toward TPA than Novozyme 435, insufficient time, and water accumulation shifting the equilibrium back toward acid.
DES + Novozyme 435 + molecular sieves (Round 2a, 48h): the reaction separated into four phases (DES liquid, white semi-crystalline PET-oligomer solid, recyclable Novozyme beads, spent molecular sieves). A white semi-crystalline solid was isolated; full FTIR/NMR/GPC characterisation of this product was still pending as of this write-up.
CDI in DMAc (Round 2b): both 24h and 48h reactions confirmed ester formation, with comparable intensity — C=O at 1718.87cm⁻¹ (24h, +45.82cm⁻¹ vs TPA) and 1721.51cm⁻¹ (48h, +48.46cm⁻¹).
CDI in THF (Round 2c): gave the strongest ester signal of any condition tested — C=O at 1726.10cm⁻¹ (+53.05cm⁻¹) at 30h, versus 1717.30cm⁻¹ (+44.25cm⁻¹) at 12h. All three diagnostic PET FTIR peaks (aromatic ester C=O ~1721cm⁻¹, C–C–O ~1245cm⁻¹, O–C–C ~1100cm⁻¹) were reproduced in the CDI products, giving strong spectroscopic evidence that the synthesised material contains the PET ester repeat unit.
Caveat: the DES-enzymatic product (Round 2a) is visually consistent with PET oligomers but was not yet confirmed by FTIR/NMR/GPC at the time of this write-up, so it should be read as promising rather than confirmed. The CDI route's ester formation, by contrast, is directly confirmed by spectroscopic evidence across all three diagnostic peaks.